Interview - Director Garth Jennings Lets Us 'Sing'
- Created on Sunday, 18 December 2016 15:45
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Sing is one of this year’s big Boxing Day releases in Australia and I recently spoke to writer-director Garth Jennings about his project…
Matt: It wasn’t until I did my homework this morning that I realised you directed the film clip for “Imitation of Life” which is my favourite REM song. That was incredibly creative for its time back in 2001.
Garth: It was an insane thing to do because it was so complicated. I love and worship R.E.M. They always made fabulous videos and so when they asked us to come with an idea for that song, you can’t say no. When it was finished, it was one of the most rewarding final results that I’ve had for a music video.
Matt: You’ve directed live action shorts and features before. Is this your first foray into the animated world? Was it a long time to go from script to screen?
Garth: Yeah, I’m completely new to this way of working. It took a lot longer than I expected as it’s been 5 years since it all began.
Matt: What was it like writing the script? There’s so much more you can do with an animated film as you don’t have to worry about settings and such.
Garth: You can, that’s true. I tried to write it like a live action film that just happened to have animals starring in it. I wasn’t going out of my way to make it nuts. However, there are points in the movie where we you couldn’t have done in a live action movie unless you had a Jerry Bruckheimer budget.
The writing process with an animated feature is ongoing. You’re continually re-writing as you’re building the scenes in story reel and getting the first voices in from the actors. The process never ends… until now which is why I’m so happy to be speaking with you.
Matt: It feels like there are parts of this film where there’s a different song every 20 seconds. Do you know how many songs are actually in the movie?
Garth: That’s a good question. I don’t know exactly how many but it’s a lot. They’re not used in their entirety because it’d be a 9 hour films so some you only hear for a few seconds. Some songs are arranged exactly as the original and some are completely different. We open with The Beatles song “Golden Slumbers” that has been done as an orchestral song with Jennifer Hudson.
Matt: What’s the process for getting all the rights to the music? I’m guessing it’s something you have to do early on given the characters have to be signing them (as opposed to using them as a backing soundtrack)?
Garth: Yeah. Many of the songs were decided upon and recorded almost two years ago. We needed to do that because so much work had to then go into creating the animation. It helps in a way because you’re not trying to choose songs that are popular in the moment because you’re never going to be in the moment. You choose songs that are right for the story and that can show these characters and their evolution.
Matt: Were there songs you really wanted but couldn’t get the rights to?
Garth: We got them all which was incredible. I’m the worst person to ask because I’m the guy who says “can we please have ‘Golden Slumbers’?” and I’m not the guy who has to go and make that happen. That’s a world of pain and I was lucky to have a team who was gracious and patient and was able to pull it all together.
Matt: One thing that’s interesting is that there are a mix of songs from the current day but also from well in the past. I’m guessing that was a conscious decision to appeal to audiences of all ages.
Garth: It wasn’t so much trying to appeal to audiences of all ages. It was trying to get as broad a range of music as we could. When we first say down and chatted about the film, one of the biggest draws was that we could have a piece of Frank Sinatra, Pavarotti and punk rock all in one film. It wasn’t in a gratuitous way but hopefully in a way that felt exciting.
Matt: How does one go about casting an animated feature? Do you have auditions in the traditional way?
Garth: In this case, no. For most of these characters, we knew exactly who would work and so we approached the likes of Matthew McConaughey and Reese Witherspoon directly. There were also people like Taron Edgerton who we knew was a fantastic actor but we’d never head him sing. He did an audition but only for the singing part. The opposite went for Tori Kelly who we knew could sing but we wanted to see how natural she was as an actor.
Matt: You’re also the writer of the film and I’m curious to know how you settled on these particular animals. As an Australian, it’s a nice touch to see a koala in the leading role.
Garth: None of the animals are really based on their country of origin. They all started as human caricatures. For example, Taron is the son of a gangster that you might see in a Guy Ritchie film so it made sense to portray them as big, goofy gorillas. With someone like Ash – she’s a goth rocker who has got a lot of attitude and a rubbish relationship with her passive aggressive boyfriend. Making her a porcupine made sense. She’s spikey and when she got angry, quills would come flying out from her body.
Matt: I think my favourite character in the film was Miss Crawly – the green iguana who serves as Buster’s assistant. I was going through the credits afterwards and realised that she was voiced by you too! How did that come about?
Garth: Before you do an animated film, you get the actors in and you do a rough version with just people in the office providing voices. I did several of the voices myself just to get it done. One of them was Miss Crawley and I just loved being this elderly lizard.
Matt: Take me through the animation process. How many people have you got working and pulling it all together? I can imagine it’s a massive undertaking.
Garth: Yeah, it’s a big number. At the film’s peak we had about 300 people working for us – and that was just in the animation studio. We had a head office in Los Angeles and we had another studio in Paris.
Matt: What are you working on at the moment? What are you going to do next?
Garth: I genuinely do not know yet. We only finished this film a little while ago and I’m so relieved.
Dunes 2016: Dinner with Rickie Fowler & Jimmy Walker!
- Created on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 20:44
- Written by Matthew Toomey
It was one of the best golf trips I've been on so I had to post a few photos on my blog to preserve the memories. There have been no movies viewed over the past week as I've spent time on the Mornington Peninsula competing in the 2016 Dunes Medal.
|Considering his Snapchats are viewed by roughly 250,000 people, it was nice to make Rickie Fowler's public feed.|
|The trip began with a game at The National Old Course which is currently ranked 10th in the country as per Australian Golf Digest.|
|The super 3-man fourball team who managed to go around The National Old Course with a score of 10 under par. The highlight was Jed Morgan's hole-out from 80m on the 12th.|
|There aren't many golf holes in the country more stunning than this. The tee shot on the 7th at The National Old Course. I flubbed an 8-iron to 20 feet.|
|With Louis Dobbelaar at the The National Old Course. He recently won the 2016 New Zealand Men's Amateur which included a win over Luke Toomey in the semi-finals. No one has more experience at beating Toomeys than Louis!|
|A great group teeing it up at The National.|
|Our accommodation for the week at St Andrew's Beach.|
|Teed it up in the Dunes Medal but putted worse than a one-armed monkey to finish with 81-83-164. Was great to see Louis, Jed and Lochie make the cut.|
|Recovery session at St Andrews Beach. Not pictured: Me because it was too bloody cold!|
|Catching up with Charlie Dann & Shae Wools-Cobb for dinner at the beautiful Portsea Hotel.|
|If it's not the longest course in Australia, I'd like to know what is. Had a crack at Moonah Links Open Course off the back tees which measures over 6,800m.|
|No trip to the Mornington Peninsula is complete without a visit to the Peninsula Hot Springs.|
|Walking with Rickie Fowler & Jimmy Walker at the Crown Casino. Kudos to my super 15-year-old contact for teeing up the experience of a lifetime.|
|Just chilling in Rickie Fowler's penthouse apartment which waiting for him to get changed for dinner.|
|It's not often you get to have dinner with two golfers ranked in the top 20 in the world. Rickie Fowler & Jimmy Walker had plenty of words to offer when it came to golf, cars and women.|
|Rickie Fowler has more than $26 million in career earnings on the PGA Tour. Jed Morgan wasn't after swing tips though. He needed Rickie to teach him about chopsticks.|
|Closing the evening with a group photo outside the Spice Temple. Thanks to Jimmy for picking up the tab for dinner (my wallet wasn't quite deep enough).|
|I was already a fan of Rickie Fowler but you can add 2016 US PGA Champion Jimmy Walker to the list. Both amazing guys with a great sense of humour.|
|Probably my favourite photo for the week. Introducing the new One Direction...|
|Competing in the 1st annual Victorian Sand Greens Links Championship. Was a tough track with plenty of water in play!|
|They say that the 18th tee at Pebble Beach is picturesque. I'd argue this one is even better.|
|The final day of the trip was spent at the World Cup of Golf at Kingston Heath and after dinner two nights earlier, we spent a bit of time following Jimmy Walker and Rickie Fowler.|
|Jimmy Walker somehow found the green out of this lie on the tricky 16th hole at Kingston Heath.|
|I guess it's true. A picture does say a 1,000 words.|
|In the car and heading to the airport at the end of the trip. Still not sure how we packed the luggage so perfectly.|
Interview - Dave Johns is 'I, Daniel Blake'
- Created on Wednesday, 16 November 2016 13:22
- Written by Matthew Toomey
I, Daniel Blake won the Palm D’or at the Cannes Festival and it’s one of the year’s most powerful films. I had the chance to speak to star Dave Johns about his unusual background, the film’s content, and the approach of director Ken Loach…
Matt: You’re a name that many won’t be familiar with here in Australia. Tell us a little about yourself.
Dave: I’ve been a stand-up comedian for 27 years. I’ve been to Australia and done the Melbourne Comedy Festival a few times as well as the Adelaide Fringe and a couple of gigs in Perth. I’ve been working all my life doing stand-up in the UK and around the world and that’s pretty much my background.
Matt: So is this your first leading role in a movie? How did Ken Loach find you?
Dave: Yeah. I did a play up in Edinburgh a few years ago with a load of comedians who wanted to do a serious play. We got together and did Reginald Rose’s 12 Angry Men. We performed it at the Edinburgh Festival and it was a massive hit. We came back the next year and did One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and then a few other ensemble plays.
The producer got in touch with me last summer to let me know Ken Loach was making a new film and he was looking for a guy my age from the North East of England. He felt I was perfect so I got in touch with the casting people and was invited in to meet Ken Loach. He got me talking about football for 10 minutes to kind of feel me out. I was invited back for 3 castings with different actresses and he then offered me the part. It knocked me for six.
Matt: Tell us about Ken Loach. He’s 80 years of age and has been making films for 50 years. What’s it like to work with an icon of British cinema who has so much experience?
Dave: I adore the man. He’s got a great sense of humour. He’s very gentle but he has a steely determination to get across his message which is fantastic. The way he works is so different. Ken shoots chronologically and you don’t get the script at the start. You get a couple of pages of script each day and so it’s like you’re living the life of the character as you go along. He has a crew around him who have been working together for years who are sworn to secrecy so they never tell you what’s going on.
Matt: Was there no script at all at the start when you signed on for this?
Dave: No. All I knew on day 1 was that my name was Daniel Blake, I had a wife who had passed away, I’d recently had a heart attack, and I’d been knocked back for sickness benefits from the welfare office. I was going to meet this young mum with two kids and we’d have a plutonic friendship together. That’s all I knew. I’d get new pages of script each day and I’d have to learn them overnight. Ken wanted it to be spontaneous and fresh and for the emotions to be real.
He doesn’t have closed sets either. There’s a scene where Hayley is in a grocery shop and it was just an ordinary shop with real people coming in and out. Ken would say “when the guy at the counter has finished paying his gas bill, we’ll start another take.” This is how the film has a real, gritty feel about it.
Matt: I know there are some people who are going to look at this film and go “this is over-exaggerated and there’s nothing wrong with the welfare system.” The screenplay from Paul Laverty – is it based on actual events?
Dave: Oh yeah. Ken and Paul could have made it a lot worse than what it’s portrayed in the film. They did extensive research, they spoke to people to worked in the job centres, and they spoke to people who had left work and become sick themselves. All the things that happen to Daniel and Katie in the film are taken from real life situations that people spoke about.
Ken actually used ex-job centre staff in the film for some of the scenes. There’s also information that came from the foodbanks that shaped one scene in particular involving Katie. They’d found a young mother in that same situation.
Matt: An important part of the film is that it’s not demonising the staff at the welfare office. Yes, the system is flawed but as we see, there are some well-intentioned people there that are sympathetic to Daniel’s cause. Have you had welfare officers speak to you as well?
Dave: I think a lot of the people who are working in job centres and implementing this system are victims as well. The government has lost sight of why social security in this country was set up. They’ve even changed the name to “benefits” to give the connotation of a hand out. It always used to be “social security” which provided security for every person in the country if you came across hard times so that you wouldn’t become destitute.
I’ve been to film festivals all through Europe and people have come up to me to say it’s happening in their country as well. This push for austerity and trying to save money has led to a level of bureaucracy that has lost sight of the person. I never knew about this before the movie. I’ve been self-employed and I haven’t been on the dole since the 1980s. Hearing about sanctions and people having to fill out 52 page forms came as a shock.
After the film came out, my ex-wife phoned and told me about her 42-year-old sister who has Down syndrome. She was called in and interviewed. She shouldn’t have been on her own but because she wants to show everyone how capable she is, she exaggerated some of her abilities. The welfare office deemed that she was able to work and she lost her benefits. The case is now being appealed but the original interview should have been terminated straight away when they released she was on her own.
Matt: I’d like to hope that cinema does have the power to instigate change. Do you know if anyone within the British government has had a chance to see the film and offer their thoughts?
Dave: Damian Green is the Work and Pensions Secretary and he said he hasn’t seen the film but that he’d seen a trailer and it was a gross exaggeration of the situation. Jeremy Corbyn raised it in question time in Parliament and asked Prime Minister Theresa May to go and see it. He even offered to buy a ticket for her.
There has been a lot in the press about the film. People who have seen it are angry with where the system has got to. It’s portraying two ordinary people that people relate to. Katie could be your sister or your daughter. Daniel could be your grandfather, uncle or dad. People who are unemployed have been branded as “scroungers” and it’s their fault that they’re poor as opposed to the system. If we’re a decent society, she should be able to help people who are less fortunate.
Matt: Tell us a little about Hayley Squires – she gives a terrific, heartfelt performance.
Dave: Hayley is an amazing actress. Ken said to me on the first day that he needed Hayley and I to listen to each other in each of the scenes. If you do that, you’ll find the truth and you’ll find the honesty that will show on screen. If you’re working alongside an actor who is always giving 100%, it makes your life a lot easier. Ken saw that in the early auditions that Hayley and I had a connection together. He’s brilliant when it comes to casting.
Matt: You had the chance to attend the Cannes Film Festival this year where the film won the top prize, the Palm D’or. What was that whole experience like?
Dave: It was insane. I was in a lift with Woody Allen, just the two of us, and the funny thing is we never spoke to each other. It was so surreal. Cannes was insane with the red carpet and thousands of photographers. Since winning the Palm D’or, this film has taken on a life of its own. I’ve heard I’ve been nominated for best actor at the European Film Awards and I’ve been nominated at the British Independent Film Awards. In Variety magazine, they had me ranked as #20 in the list of actors who might be nominated for an Oscar this year. I’m in between Jake Gyllenhaal and Colin Farrell which is insane. There are times when I think “have I just banged my head and am in a coma somewhere?” I’m so proud that the film is having an impact around the world.
Matt: What’s the plan going forward? Would you like to continue making feature films or do you have other things in mind?
Dave: I would love to keep making movies and I’ve got some offers coming in at the moment. I want to find the right project. If I never made another film ever, I can always say that I was the lead in a Ken Loach film that won the Palm D’or at the Cannes Film Festival. I could definitely accept that. I’ve still got the day job and I’m still doing stand-up. I’m off to Paris tomorrow to do two shows and then I’m off to Slovenia. So yeah, I’d love to do more films but if it doesn’t happen, it doesn’t happen.
Interview - Writer-Director Ed Zwick Brings Us 'Jack Reacher: Never Go Back'
- Created on Monday, 17 October 2016 10:24
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Jack Reacher: Never Go Back reunites director Ed Zwick with star Tom Cruise. They worked together in 2003 on The Last Samurai. I recently spoke over the phone with Ed to ask him about his latest movie…
Matt: How’s it going?
Ed: Very well thanks. We’re in Beijing right now.
Matt: The Chinese market is so huge and has a big impact on a film’s international box-office…
Ed: It is. Tom and I have both found great success here in China and so we said we definitely wanted to visit as part of the promotion for the film.
Matt: I realise that you’ve worked with Tom Cruise before on The Last Samurai back in 2003. How did you get involved in this project? Did Tom help get you in?
Ed: That’s right. The phone rang and I saw it was Tom and said to myself “I’ll take that call.” (laughs) I had never done this kind of movie before but he knew I liked this genre and he asked if I would be keen to jump in. I read the book and realised there was a lot that could be fun to do. We got together and talked about what we could accomplish and then went from there.
Matt: The previous film was written and directed by Christopher McQuarrie and I notice he’s one of the producers here. Did he provide a lot of input or were you left to your own devices here?
Ed: I’ve known Chris for a long time and he’s actually worked for me before. There were a couple of moments where I talked things out with him and he was very helpful. He also understands that a writer-director wants to make his own movie and he was respectful of that.
Matt: You’ve made some great films in your career like Glory, Legends of the Fall, and Blood Diamond, but I notice this is the first time you’ve come on board for a sequel. Is that right?
Ed: Yeah. It’s also my first franchise too. I was wary but the fact that Tom and I had worked together before was a help. We also knew we were trying to do something a little bit different from the first movie. If I felt I was doing a mere repeat of the original then I think I would have shied away. I think this movie is more a reflection of what interests me as opposed to what interests Chris.
Matt: Over your career, you’ve had the chance to direct some of Hollywood’s biggest stars – Denzel Washington, Meg Ryan, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Morgan Freeman. Is there something special about them that justifies the price tag? Or are they just like working with any other actor?
Ed: It’s funny. I like to think that they’ve made their money on the back of being a great actor. Obviously they have something unique that captures an audience’s imagination but I have always thought about casting movie stars as actors and treating them as actors. The best ones want to be treated as actors and I would definitely include Tom in that list. He’s known from a young age what a director can do to bring out a great performance and it’s why he’s worked with so many great directors.
I can think of a couple of people I wouldn’t work with again because they didn’t have a humility, joy and gratitude that you want as part of a team. Those names that you mentioned are all a privilege to work with. They have an understanding of not just what they can do but also what a movie is. Tom’s career has been about more than a great smile and physicality.
Matt: Do you stay in touch with all these actors you’ve worked with multiple times? Are you always looking for opportunities to work together again?
Ed: We actually all live very different lives. I happened to see Denzel two weeks ago because I was at Paramount and he was in the cutting room working on Fences. I knocked on the door, chatted for an hour and then had lunch together. I don’t think I’d seen him for at least a year. The fondness and the experiences from working on a movie are often quite intense and profound. You don’t forget them.
Matt: Well tell me a little about Cobie Smulders. I was reading she broke her leg before the shoot. Is that right?
Ed: The first time we met, she came into my office with a cane and her leg in a brace. I said “what the fuck is this?” and she said she’d just broken it and that it was going to be fine. I was a bit sceptical because this was to be a very physical movie. She told me that she’d been an athlete in college and that she wouldn’t put herself in a situation unless she thought she could handle it. The doctors then looked her over, agreed with that assessment, an she ended up doing an extraordinary job.
Matt: People will be familiar with Tom Cruise and to a lesser extent Cobie Smulders because of her roles in the Marvel films but aside from those two, most of the cast will be relatively unknown to filmgoers. Was it a deliberate decision to go with some lesser known actors?
Ed: One of the great pleasures of having a big name movie star already on the film is that you don’t have to fill the remaining roles with names to satisfy a foreign investor who believes it will add value. It’s just about casting great actors. The kid who plays Prudhomme, Austin Hébert, just graduated from Southern Methodist University and is a really great actor. I saw Aldis Hodge in Straight Outta Compton and it was fun to work with him too.
Matt: How did you approach the action scenes? Given that action movies are a staple of the Hollywood diet, is there something you’re trying to do to make these particular scenes stand out?
Ed: I believe that they’re most interesting if they can advance the story and the relationships between the characters. If they’re just there for the sake of action then I don’t think they add much. I can point to a couple of scenes in this movie that I think help us follow the story and it feels more organic to the piece itself.
Matt: Do you have precise angles in mind when you’re shooting the action scenes or have you got a hundred cameras going at once and you leave it up to the editor to piece it together?
Ed: An editor can show you things you never imagined but no, I’m pretty specific with how I shoot these scenes. As we choreographed these scenes and worked with the stunt people and actors, I’m often shooting the scenes on tape to get a sense of what’s going to be the best angle. You have to be pretty specific as these scenes are dangerous, you don’t want anyone to get hurt, and you don’t want to have to shoot them too many times because that adds to the risk.
Matt: I have to finish up by asking a couple of non-Jack Reacher questions. I’m a big Oscars buff and you won an Academy Award for producing Shakespeare in Love which was one of the big upsets in Oscars history. Did you see it that way? Was it a huge shock to you when they opened the envelope?
Ed: You never really think about it in terms of a bet. I’ll tell you that the following year, we were convinced that we were going to win for Traffic and the found it was Gladiator who took the top prize. It’s weird that you’ve made a movie that you think is the best thing you’ve ever done… and then you go along to an awards show and suddenly think of yourself as a loser. It’s really screwed up and typical of Hollywood to make you feel bad about something that you should feel good about.
Matt: What are you working on at the moment? What projects will see from your next?
Ed: Not sure yet. There’s something we’re starting to write and I hope it turns out as I wish but you never know.
- Interview - Speaking With The Cast Of 'Spin Out'
- Interview - Jack Huston On A Reminagined 'Ben-Hur'
- Interview - Writer-Director Abe Forsythe On 'Down Under'
- Interview - Aussie Xavier Samuel on 'Love & Friendship'
- Interview - Writer-Director Ivan Sen On 'Goldstone'
- Interview - Taika Waititi On 'Hunt For The Wilderpeople'
- Interview - Anthony LaPaglia On 'A Month Of Sundays'
- An Unforgettable Golfing Bucket List Trip