Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 10 February 2016

What do I look for in a good movie?  My usual answer is creativity and originality.  As a fan of superhero flicks, I’m the first to admit they’ve been feeling a little tired over the past few years.  They’ve been following the same formulas and have been drumming over the same themes (“absolute power corrupts absolutely”).

The timing is perfect because Deadpool has come along like a breath of fresh air.  It’s unlike anything we’ve seen from the Marvel franchise before.  Ryan Reynolds stars as Wade Wilson – an intimidating mercenary for hire.  His talents are illustrated in an early scene where he is hired by a young woman to stop a bothersome stalker.

Wade expects to live and long and fruitful life but that changes after being diagnosed with terminal cancer.  Out of desperation, he undergoes a radical mutation therapy that has unintended side effects.  On the positive side, the cancer is gone and he has super-healing powers.  He is almost impossible to kill and has taken on the new name of Deadpool.  On the negative side, his face is badly disfigured.  He now wears a mask and has distanced himself from his loving girlfriend, Vanessa (Baccarin).

He’s a terrific fighter but above all else, Deadpool has mastered the insult.  It doesn’t matter whether you’re his friend or his enemy.  He’s going to be sending a few barbs your way.  It’s rude, it’s crude, and it’s politically incorrect.  I said the same about the awful Dirty Grandpa but this film is exceedingly better because the story is better and the wit is sharper.  Writers Paul Wernick and Rhett Reese deserve praise for creating such an amusing script.  The unorthodox opening titles tell you from the outset that this film is different.  Oh, and wait until you see the Stan Lee cameo!

The film also differentiates itself with a sense of self-awareness.  Deadpool regularly breaks through the “fourth wall” and talks directly to the audience.  He’s not afraid to mock the superhero genre either.  There’s a great scene where Deadpool is about to kill a villainous henchman but then he realises that they’re old friends.  It’s reminiscent of the Austin Powers movies.

The narrative is a little weaker when it comes to the villain – a guy called Ajax (Skrein) who was responsible for the mutation therapy.  He gets under your skin and his signature moment involves a capsule that deprives the occupant of oxygen.  That said, it’s hard to understand why he’s so villainous and what Wade was hoping to get from his services in the first place.

I’m not sure if this has the material to justify multiple sequels but as a stand-alone superhero movie, it’s about as much fun as you could ask for.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 30 January 2016

If you’re an adult going along to see an animated movie, it’s more than likely that you’ll be taking your kids along too.  That’s because the overwhelming majority of animated features are pitched at family audiences.  They’re light, they offer plenty of humour, and they include an array of cute, loveable characters.

Charlie Kaufman is no ordinary filmmaker and it’s no surprise that his foray into the animated genre doesn’t follow the aforementioned rules.  He’s the man behind some of cinema’s most creative screenplays – Being John Malkovich, Adaptation and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.  The later won him an Academy Award in 2005.

Anomalisa began its life as a “sound play” back in 2005.  Kaufman teamed up with music composer Carter Burwell to create a different theatrical experience.  Performed in front of live audiences, the actors sat on stage and simply read their scripts.  There were no sets, no costumes, and no character movements.  Burwell wanted patrons to simply close their eyes and picture the story in their own way.  Recordings were later released online for wider audiences to enjoy.

It wasn’t until several years later that Kaufman met director Duke Johnson and they began work on a movie version using stop-motion animation.  Let be clear that this isn’t a movie for kids.  It is a layered drama centred around 24 hours in the life of Michael Stone (Thewlis), an acclaimed writer who is attending a conference in Cincinnati to promote his latest book on customer service.  Michael is a big deal.  There’s a brief scene where guests stop, stare and whisper as he walks through the lobby of his hotel.

Michael’s success has done little for his dwindling self-confidence.  The word is never used but a strong argument could be made that he’s suffering from depression.  Nothing seems to make him happy.  He calls his wife and son to say that he’s arrived safely at the hotel but you can tell from the sound of his voice that it feels like an unnecessary chore.  He’s just as disinterested when making small talk with an inquisitive taxi driver.

His evening is given an unexpected jolt when he meets Lisa (Leigh), an adoring fan who is staying at the hotel.  They have a few too many drinks and wind up back at his room for a romantic encounter.  I’m not sure I’ve seen a stop-motion sex scene before so it’s another thing to tick off my cinema bucket list.  It also explains the film’s MA rating in Australia.  The Classification Board must have given it a little extra thought compared to your average movie.

A curious touch to Anomalisa is that aside from the two leads, every other character has the same face and the same voice (Noonan).  It’s an interesting creative choice but it helps us get inside Michael’s head – he sees the world has a tired, disappointing place where everything feels the same and nothing provides him with satisfaction.  That’s my interpretation anyway.  Kaufman has been deliberately coy while on the interview circuit.  He’ll talk about the production process but wants audiences to reach their own conclusions about these characters and the film’s messages.

It’s a simple story on paper but Anomalisa is a great conversation generator.  I’m still reflecting on its style and themes.  It took home the Grand Jury Prize from the Venice Film Festival and recently earned an Academy Award nomination for best animated feature.  As one of the year’s most original movies, you can add my name to its growing list of fans.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 06 February 2016

Brooklyn is a beautifully told story.  It begins in 1952 and introduces us to Eilis Lacey (Ronan), a young woman from a small Irish town who lives with her mother (Brennan) and older sister, Rose (Glascott).  It’s a place that doesn’t offer a lot of career options but Eilis seems content.  She has a part time job in a convenience store and a nice set of friends she hangs out with regularly.

Determined to see her sister make something more of her life, Rose pressures Eilis into immigrating to the United States.  She has been in touch with a Catholic priest (Broadbent) and has arranged for Eilis to live in a boarding house in Brooklyn, New York under the watchful eye of its no-nonsense landlady (Walters).

It’s a difficult period for the shy, quiet Eilis.  It’s a particularly sad moment as she makes the long voyage by ship.  She is going from a tiny town where she knows everyone… to a giant city across the Atlantic Ocean where she knows no one.  She’s instantly homesick and letters from back home do little to help.  Rose tells Eilis that “even if your letters were 200 pages they still wouldn’t be long enough for your mother.”

It takes a little time but Eilis slowly forges a way through the melancholy.  She finds work as a clerk in a posh convenience store and develops a rapport with the customers.  She starts taking accounting classes at night with the hope of moving into the business world.  She makes new friends and immerses herself in the American-Irish culture.  She meets a young Italian plumber, Tony (Cohen), who is determined to win her affections.

Fate then throws a curveball in Eilis’s direction.  An unexpected event forces her to return to Ireland for a brief period and while there, she faces increasing pressure to make her stay permanent.  A company offers well-paid work as a bookkeeper and she is pursued by a well-to-do suitor, Jim (Gleeson).  Provided with two viable choices, Eilis now must make the toughest of decisions – where does she want to spend the rest of her life and who does she want to spend it with?

Based on the 2009 novel by Colm Tóibín and adapted for the screen by Nick Hornby (About A Boy), Brooklyn’s characters are honest and genuine.  This is particularly evident when exploring Eilis’s romantic dilemma.  In most Hollywood movies, one guy turns out to be a jerk/problem and the choice becomes obvious.  That’s seldom the case in reality and there’s no “villain” here.  Tony and Jim are both terrific people and it’s easy to see why Eilis’s heart is so torn.

After her breakout performance in Joe Wright’s Atonement (which earned her an Academy Award nomination in 2008), Saoirse Ronan has put together a strong resume working alongside directors such as Peter Jackson, Gillian Armstrong, Peter Weir, Neil Jordan and Wes Anderson.  She is truly outstanding in Brooklyn.  Eilis is not a hugely talkative character but you’ll feel all of her emotions.  It ties into a recent comment made by director John Crowley (Boy A, Closed Circuit) that “there’s nothing more beautiful than a close-up of a face changing its mind.”

The superb supporting cast is headlined by the relatively unknown Emory Cohen (The Place Beyond The Pines).  He shares some charmingly awkward moments with Ronan as their newfound romance takes shape.  They provide the film’s best scenes.  Jane Brennan adds sentimentality as Eilis’s brooding mother and Julie Walters (Billy Elliot) provides several good laughs as the sharp-witted head of the religious boarding house.

Brooklyn is a sweet, moving, gorgeously-shot tale about a woman trying to find where she belongs.  If I see a better film this year, I'll be surprised.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 25 January 2016

When trying to describe this storyline to a friend, the first adjective that came to mind was “unimaginable”.  That doesn’t really fit though.  The fact that audiences can “imagine” themselves in the same situation is what makes it so terrifying.  It is a work of fiction based on the novel by Emma Donoghue but we know that such events have occurred before.

The first half of the film is set entirely in a soundproof room that is roughly 3 metres by 3 metres.  It’s where Joy Newsome (Larson) has spent the last 7 years of her life.  She was kidnapped as a 17-year-old and has been held captive by a man who has never revealed his name (Nick).  He provides her with meagre amounts of food and rapes her on a daily basis.

It’s obvious from her body language that Joy is a defeated woman.  She’s given up hope of rescue and her feeble escape plans have amounted to nothing.  The only thing that keeps her going is her 5-year-old son, Jack (Tremblay).  He was born in the tiny room and has no idea of the expansive world that exists outside its walls.

It’s hard to envisage any child turning out “normal” from such an ordeal but the catch is that Jack doesn’t know any different.  For years, his mother has told him that “room” is all that exists in the world.  The dogs and squirrels they see in shows on their rundown television are all make believe.  Joy has fed these stories to her curious son to help protect him.  He’s not yet ready to deal with the reality of their situation.

The trailer gives it away and so I’m not revealing too much when I say they eventually make it outside of their room.  The escape offers the film’s most intense sequence.  What follows are their troubled attempts to adjust to a completely new life.  Jack has few social skills and has been taken completely out of his comfort zone.  Joy is still traumatised and is struggling to fit back into a world that believed she was dead.

Winner of the coveted People’s Choice Award at the 2015 Toronto Film Festival, Room is both horrifying and inspiring.  It shows us the best and worst of the human condition.  In their respective leading roles, Brie Larson (Short Term 12) and newcomer Jacob Tremblay have created a powerful, credible bond.  Larson is the short priced favourite to win the best actress Oscar next month and you’ll feel a huge amount of empathy for both characters.

My only problem with the film was that it’s told largely from the perspective of Jack.  He provides the narration and it’s through his downward looking eyes that we see events unfold.  This works within the room but in the outside world, it feels limiting.  Joy’s continual disintegration becomes the more interesting subplot but she slips from view in the later stages.  A moment where she is interrogated by a television reporter never rings true.

Nominated for 4 Academy Awards including best picture and best director, Room hits most of its marks.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 30 January 2016

It’s not often we see two biopics about the same individual within the space of 3 years.  Released in mid-2013, Jobs starred Ashton Kutcher and chronicled the life of the famed technology entrepreneur up until the launch of the iPod in 2001.  The film was panned by critics (scoring just 27% on Rotten Tomatoes) and struggled to perform at the box office. 

Undeterred, Sony Pictures pushed ahead with their own movie.  They bought the rights to Steve Jobs’ autobiography and assembled a heavyweight cast and crew.  Oscar winner Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network) penned the screenplay.  Oscar winner Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire) sat in the director’s chair.  Oscar nominated Michael Fassbender (12 Years A Slave) took the title role.

Sorkin has structured the film as a three act play.  It follows Jobs as he prepares for the public launch of three products – the Apple Macintosh in 1984, the NeXT Computer in 1988, and the iMac in 1998.  Roughly 40 minutes is spent on each segment.  There’s nothing in between except for a few odd flashbacks.

By taking this approach, Sorkin has created something that feels staged and unrealistic.  It’s as if every key person in Steve Jobs’ life wants to complain in the half-hour leading up to each launch.  His close associate (Rogen) is unhappy that he won’t acknowledge important employees in his speech.  His former girlfriend (Waterson) is pleading for financial support to care for their daughter.  His boss (Daniels) is worried about sales figures and the future of the company.  His loyal marketing guru (Winslet) is struggling to keep him focused on what is important.

The film’s repetitive message (at least from my perspective) is that Steve Jobs was a selfish control freak and an asshole.  The version we see of him in 1984 isn’t all that different from 1998.  He was obsessed with his own perception and took little interest in the well-being of others.  Not everyone agrees with this portrayal however.  Former Apple CEO John Sculley and long-time journalist Walt Mossberg (amongst others) have spoken publicly about a friendlier side to Jobs that isn’t shown in the movie.

Michael Fassbender is one of the best actors in the business and he does a first-rate job in replicating his character’s demeanour and mannerisms.  Helping shape his performance were numerous meetings with colleagues who knew Jobs closely.  It’s a shame the dialogue isn’t as authentic.  Boyle has shot the movie like a fast-paced, behind-the-scenes documentary but every character appears to have spent an hour choosing the perfect words before opening their mouths.

It’s not all bad.  There are a few good one-liners.  At the unveiling of the Macintosh, Jobs says “we blow this and IBM will own the next 50 years like a Batman villain.”  There’s another important moment where he compares himself to an orchestra conductor.

In a curious twist of fate, Steve Jobs also underperformed financially when released in the United States back in October.  Perhaps the marketing strategy didn’t work.  Then again, perhaps people aren’t interested in the story of an egocentric billionaire, despite the mark he has made on the world.