Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 18 April 2012

I thought of it as being like a Hallmark telemovie.  A fellow critic described it as the movie equivalent of a Mills & Boon novel.  Both metaphors should give you a fairly good idea as to what to expect with The Lucky One, the latest adaptation of a Nicholas Sparks novel.

Sparks wouldn’t be short of a dollar.  He keeps churning out popular books and Hollywood keeps knocking on his front door and asking to buy the cinematic rights.  Since 1999, seven of his novels have reached the big screen – Message In A Bottle, A Walk To Remember, The Notebook, Nights In Rodanthe, Dear John, The Last Song and now The Lucky One.

It brings back memories of our infatuation with crime writer John Grisham in the 1990s.  You always knew what to expect from Grisham (a twisting thriller with a hero who overcomes many obstacles to succeed in the end) but it didn’t stop us from buying his books and seeing his films.  People liked his style.

As for Nicholas Sparks, he seems intent on crowning himself “king” of the romantic drama genre.  His movie adaptations have always involved two likeable characters who seem perfect for each other but tragedy does its best to keep them apart.  I wouldn’t describe myself as a huge fan of Sparks but I admit that the healthy box-office of his previous films proves that a substantial audience does exist.

This leads me to the obvious conclusion that some will like The Lucky One.  Unfortunately, I do not belong in this category.  I found the film to be one of the silliest romantic dramas that I’ve seen for a while.  This is through no fault of stars Zac Efron (High School Musical) and newcomer Taylor Schilling.  Both have talent and you can see they’re trying their best to look like a couple who belong together.

The problem is that this story is so contrived, so unrealistic.  It begins with scenes of U.S. Marine Logan Thibault (Efron) fighting in Iraq.  He narrowly escapes a bomb blast and in the process, he finds a picture of a beautiful woman that appears to have been lost by another soldier.  He keeps it as a good luck charm and it keeps him safe for the remainder of his tour of duty.

He returns to his home in United States as a broken man.  He’s having trouble slipping back into reality and cannot forget the atrocities he witnessed in Iraq.  Looking to cleanse his mind, Logan goes in search of the mysterious woman in the photo and it leads him to a small town in North Carolina.  He is finally able to put a name to the face – Beth Clayton (Schilling).

Logan isn’t up front about his past.  If he was, there wouldn’t be movie, would there?  He doesn’t say anything about the photo and instead, accepts a job working for Beth as a dog walker.  It’s a convenient way for Logan to get close and find out about her background before going in too deep.

It doesn’t take long for the sparks to fly and so the time has come to flick the switch and throw in a few complications.  Aside from Logan’s “hidden past”, Beth also has problems.  Her obsessive ex-husband (Ferguson) doesn’t like seeing Beth with a new guy and is determined to intervene.  I should also mention that (1) he’s a police officer, (2) he’s the son of the popular mayor, and (3) he’s an over-the-top schmuck.  All of these factors will make life very difficult for Beth and Logan.

There were a few moments midway through the film where I was almost drawn into the story… but any chance of leaving the cinema with positive thoughts was destroyed by the ridiculous, somewhat distasteful ending.  It’s rushed and doesn’t fit with everything in the lead up.

I’ve long been a supporter of director Scott Hicks (Shine, Snow Falling On Cedars) but this is his weakest film to date.  More time needed to be spent exploring these characters as opposed to showing us picturesque landscapes to the backdrop of songs preaching about love and sunshine.  No thanks.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 04 April 2012

The Prime Minister’s Press Secretary, Patricia Maxwell (Thomas) is woken in the middle of the night with bad news coming out of Afghanistan.  There’s been a bombing at mosque and the negative press will only add further fuel to the debate that the UK should pull their troops out of the war.  She storms into the office the next morning and demands that her staff find a good news story from the Middle East to help push public sentiment in the other direction.

She stumbles across a very bizarre story.  A wealthy sheik (Waked) in Yemen is trying to introduce salmon fishing into his country.  He has hired a consultant with the curious name of Harriet Chetwode-Talbot (Blunt) to research its viability.  It leads Ms Chetwode-Talbot to the office of British fisheries expert Fred Jones (McGregor) but she doesn’t get the answer she was hoping for.  Mr Jones laughs at the absurdity of the idea and quickly shows her the door.

That’s not the end of it however.  The Prime Minister’s Office is keen for this to happen and still seeks the positive publicity (for reasons not made clear).  Money is no barrier for the sheik and Ms Chetwode-Talbot and Mr Jones are forced to team up and find a way forward.  Oh, and I should mention that a romantic connection develops between them.  Oh, and she also has a boyfriend who is in the army but he’s missing in action in the Middle East.

I know a few people who are fans of this film and they seemed to take it as a light hearted romantic comedy.  I saw things from different perspective.  In fact, I don’t know what the film wanted to be.  If it intended to be a rom-com, why did we need the moronic subplot involving Kristin Scott Thomas and the Prime Minister’s Office?  I’ve seen Bond villains that were more realistic and I hated her character from the opening scene.

There’s another poorly developed subplot involving that involves the sheik arguing with locals about his crazy proposal and preaching about the importance of faith.  It typifies the predictable, force-fed nature of the whole story.  It’s all black and white with no grey in between.

As for the romance… call me cold hearted but I didn’t buy into it either.  I had no issues with the charming Emily Blunt (The Devil Wears Prada) but I found Ewan McGregor’s character too nerdish and boring.  Could it have been improved with a different actor in the role?  I’m not entirely convinced but am leaning towards yes.

I can’t fault the pedigree of the filmmakers with Lasse Hallstrom (The Cider House Rules) sitting in the director’s chair and Simon Beaufoy (Slumdog Millionaire) responsible for the screenplay.  For whatever reason, they haven’t been up to the challenge of bringing Paul Torday’s novel to the big screen.  It’s silly, it’s corny and it’s not for me.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 15 April 2012

The French Film Festival recently wrapped its tour of Australia and now, as has become a tradition, a select few of the films will be released more widely across the country.  The beautiful Goodbye, First Love is already in cinemas and it has now been joined by Romantics Anonymous – ideal of those looking for a silly, light-hearted perspective on love.

Jean-René (Poelvoorde) is the hapless owner of a boutique chocolate-making business.  He believes in the delicious chocolate being produced in his small factory but it seems his customers do not.  They’re tired of the traditional offerings and sales are drying up.

The answer to his prayers is Angélique Delange, a young chocolatier (Carré) who turns up at the factory in response to a job offer.  She initially comes on board as a salesperson and tries to persuade retailers to stock the products from this ailing brand.  It turns out that she will be far more valuable than anyone realises.  Her creativity in the kitchen and her intimate knowledge of chocolate will create a new product line that may yet save the business.

It’s not going to be that easy however.  These two characters have fallen in love but have absolutely no idea how to express their feelings for each other.  Everyone around them can see what’s going on but Jean-René and Angélique refuse to open up.  He’s seeing a psychiatrist for advice and she’s attending a self-help group entitled Romantics Anonymous.  Put simply – they’re hopeless!

It’s a fairly simple story and the film clocks in at just 80 minutes.  The whole over-the-top nature of the scenario was fun for a while but it wears thin during the later stages.  It’s hard to sit there and watch them continually act like clueless morons.  Their ridiculous first date in a restaurant left me wondering if I was watching the dumbed down French equivalent of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

Whilst I hoped there would be a little more substance, I still found myself caught up in the charm of this farce.  Benoît Poelvoorde and Isabelle Carré deserve praise for their leading performances.  Their characters are completely neurotic and part of me wanted to get up and slap them across the face… but they’re hard not to like given their innocence and insecurities.

We all know what it’s like to fall in love – I just hope that we never have to make it this difficult for ourselves!

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 04 April 2012

Thirteen years ago, if I mentioned the term “American Pie”, most would think of the 1971 folk song performed by Don McLean.  The beautiful lyrics recounted the plane crash that killed Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens and The Big Bopper in 1959.  My dad played the song quite often and the chorus will be forever stuck in my head.

How times have changed.  Nowadays, “American Pie” is perhaps more widely known as a long-running and successful movie franchise aimed squarely at a younger crowd.  It all began with a nerdy guy in high school sticking his you-know-what into a warm apple pie.

The original (which made more than $100m at the box-office) was followed by two theatrical sequels and four direct-to-DVD releases.  I have to confess that I haven’t seen any of the direct-to-DVD stuff.  As the only person to feature in all of the movies, I asked Eugene Levy (aka Jim’s Dad) about the direct-to-DVD stuff and he admitted that he hasn’t seen them either!  It was a surprisingly honest answer.

Fans of the series will be happy to know that a little more effort has been put into American Pie: Reunion.  For starters, all of the original cast members have returned.  Perhaps they wanted to catch up and perhaps they needed the pay cheque.  I’m not too fazed.  Secondly, and most importantly, they’ve written a script.  It’s not the greatest but it will provide enough laughs for those who enjoyed the earlier films.

The title speaks for itself when it comes to the premise.  All the characters have returned to East Great Falls for their high school reunion.  They’ve flown into town a few days before the official reunion so they can spend time together and relive their fun-filled teenage years.  They’re all putting on a brave face… but we quickly learn that they haven’t moved on to bigger and better things.  Each of them has problems when it comes to love and/or work.

Don’t worry though.  This isn’t a depressing, brooding drama.  It’s filled with the same politically-incorrect humour that we’ve come to expect (like it or not) from the American Pie franchise.  The father-son chats between Eugene Levy and Jason Biggs will leave you cringing.  Sean William Scott (as Stifler) hasn’t changed at all and his relentless pursuit of the opposite sex will shock and offend.  A well-timed piece of nudity will also catch many off guard.

My thoughts on the film can be summed up using the metaphor of a high school reunion.  It was nice to catch up with these people but I grew tired in the later stages and remembered why we haven’t stayed in touch.  These characters didn’t have many exciting stories to tell and I was hoping for more from the screenplay as a whole.  The subplots involving Chris Klein, Mena Suvari, Thomas Ian Nicholas, Tara Reid and Eddie Kaye Thomas have little to offer.

It would appear this marks the end of the American Pie series and so I must finish on a positive note and say that it’s been a great ride.  I can still remember seeing the original back in 1999 and it inspired the name of my website – The Film Pie.  If only my site was as popular!

You can read my interview with star Eugene Levy by clicking here.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 11 April 2012

There’s a scene midway through Battleship where star Taylor Kitsch is looking at a dead alien that has been brought aboard his ship.  Another alien suddenly blasts through the cabin wall, picks up his compatriot and disappears into the distance.  Taylor turns and says “I’ve got a bad feeling about this.”

Several people in the audience started laughing.  Then others started laughing at those who were laughing.  The question I’m now asking myself – was this the intention of director Peter Berg?  Were we supposed to be entertained by the horrendously cheesy dialogue?  If so, couldn’t they have dusted off Arnold Schwarzenegger for the leading role and let us know from the outset that it’s a comedy?

For those interested, the wafer-thin premise revolves around Alex Hopper (Kitsch), an immature 26-year-old with a life that is going nowhere.  After he is arrested for drunkenly breaking into a convenience store, his older brother forces him to join the U.S. Navy.  You’d think the discipline would have done him some good but nope, that’s not the case.  He’s still a selfish individual who cares only for himself.

A few years pass and Alex somehow rises to the rank of lieutenant but it seems his time is finally up.  While out at sea on a routine exercise, he stupidly ends up in a bathroom brawl with a fellow officer.  Vice Admiral Shane (Neeson) has had enough and informs Alex that he’ll be sacked from the navy when they return to shore.  Oh and wait for this – Alex just so happens to be dating the Vice Admiral’s daughter (Decker) and was about to ask for her hand in marriage before things went pear shaped.

You can forget about the back story once the aliens arrive.  The script is thrown out the window and we’re treated to a mindless, trashy action-fest.  It’s like watching a video game.  Why are the aliens there?  What are they trying to communicate back home?  Why do they blow stuff up but choose not to kill certain humans?  Why do they have a weakness (which I won’t spoil) that makes no sense considering where they came from?  No answers are provided.

Through a series of convenient plot devices, the irresponsible Alex finds himself captaining the only naval ship that has a chance of defeating the aliens.  The world rests on his shoulders and you should have a fair idea about how it’ll pan out.

It’s been exploited time-and-time again but there’s still life in the “alien invasion” genre.  We’ve seen this in the past decade with great films such as Cloverfield, Super 8, Monsters, War Of The Worlds, District 9 and Signs.  They’re the pick of the bunch because of their intriguing stories and the fact they offer something a little different.

That’s not the case with Battleship.  There's nothing original in the script from brothers Jon and Erich Hoeber (Red) and they've failed to create any interesting characters despite a running time of more than two hours.  Further, many subplots are underdeveloped.  We are treated to obligatory scenes involving politicians / officials sitting around a table but for what purpose?  I’d say the same about the romance between Alex and the Vice Admiral’s daughter.

I consider this to be one of year’s worst but there are two positives worth mentioning.  In her acting debut, Rihanna’s strong, feisty performance as a weapons specialist shows her potential as an actor.  Equally impressive is Hamish Linklater (The New Adventures Of Old Christine) who provides the film with its only (intended) laughs as an insecure scientist.  These two characters are far more exciting that the dreary, monotone Taylor Kitsch (John Carter) and the surprisingly absent Liam Neeson (The Grey).

Battleship is being released in most of the major markets this weekend – here in Australia as well as in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan.  Notice anything missing from that list?  Despite being a big Hollywood blockbuster with a $200m budget, the film isn’t being released in the United States and Canada for another 5 weeks.  If anyone can tell me why, I’m all ears.