Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 18 September 2013

As part of my non-film related life, I sit on the Board of Golf Queensland and am manager of the Queensland men’s amateur team that competes once a year against the other states. Most of them would have dreams of going on and becoming a successful professional golfer. They’d hope to play for millions every week in the United States and follow in the footsteps of other successful Queenslanders such as Greg Norman, Adam Scott and Jason Day.

Will they all make it? Hell no! The world of professional sport can be incredibly difficult to break into. While 10 Australians have made more than $500,000 this year on the U.S. PGA Tour, there are hundreds of other professionals struggling here in Australia. They travel from town-to-town and compete against each other in pro-ams where the prize pool doesn’t often exceed $15,000. A 10^th place finish (still pretty good) might only get you $250. It’s a tough way to make a living.

So what do I say to the members of the Queensland golf team? Should I be a realist? Tell them that the odds of making it are ridiculously slim and that it’s time to start thinking about a back-up plan or another career? Or do I need to play the role of a dreamer? What if they are one of the lucky ones? How will they succeed if I’m not offering encouragement and support?

Movies on this subject usually favour the same point of view. In fact, there are two films out this week that have the same theme. In Planes, we follow a small crop duster who wants to compete against the much bigger planes and win a lucrative around the world race. He’s a massive underdog but he goes on to win the race and prove the naysayers wrong.

Turbo centres on a young snail (voiced by Ryan Reynolds) who is fascinated by motor racing and in particular, the Indianapolis 500. But it’s not like a snail can enter the race, right? Wrong. After being exposed to nitrous oxide in an accident, Turbo suddenly develops ridiculous speed. He is found by a simple taco truck driver (Pena) who, with the help of some other snails, finds a way of getting Turbo into the race where he’ll become a media sensation!

Another common attribute of such films is the way that they make you want to cheer for the underdog. To do so, they portray the favourite / current champion as an arrogant schmuck (despite this seldom reflecting reality). Here, Turbo finds himself up against the top driver in the sport – the villainous Guy Gagné (Hader) who will use every dirty tactic in the book to make sure he retains the Indianapolis 500 title.

The film is taking a safe, familiar approach with its “no dream is too big” message. I’d like to see family-oriented flicks take a few more chances but for what it is, Turbo makes for decent viewing. The story is easy to follow, the characters are cute and the voices have been well chosen. There’s also room for a few jokes when exploring the ever-so-slow life of a common garden snail.

Given that it eclipses both Planes and The Smurfs 2, Turbo is my pick of the animated features over the September school holidays.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 09 September 2013

The greed, corruption and mismanagement that led to the 2008 global financial crisis have been covered in numerous movies over the past few years. We’ve had feature dramas such as Margin Call, Too Big To Fail and Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps. We’ve also been treated to some great documentaries including Capitalism: A Love Story and the Academy Award winning Inside Job (a personal favourite of mine).

This new film from Woody Allen tackles the same subject matter but comes at it from a different angle. Blue Jasmine doesn’t focus on the rich finance guy doing bunch of dodgy, unethical stuff. Rather, we see things from the perspective of his wife.

When we first meet Jasmine (Blanchett), she’s rocking up at the doorstep of her sister, Ginger (Hawkins), who lives in San Francisco. She’s not there because she wants to catch up with her younger sibling. She’s there because she has nowhere else to go. Jasmine was once the wife of an extremely wealthy investment manager (Baldwin) living in New York but she lost everything after her husband was convicted of massive fraud and sentenced to prison.

It’s been tough for Jasmine to deal with her quick descent from “riches to rags”. This is a woman who has grown very, very accustomed to her life as a wealthy socialite. Given she’s never had a job and shows little interest in the daily news cycle, Jasmine’s conversation starters tend to be limited to her lavish overseas holidays, her expensive shopping trips and her husband’s successful real estate investments.

Jasmine may sound like a selfish, narcissistic human being but Woody Allen’s masterful screenplay doesn’t judge her. This could easily have been crafted as a simple comedy where we go “ha ha, let’s laugh at his dumb woman who is finally getting what she deserves.” Thankfully, it’s much deeper than that. There are moments where we get to see behind Jasmine’s selfish, delusional exterior and find someone who is troubled, scared and insecure.

It will be a sad day when Woody Allen finally retires from filmmaking. It’s been 35 years since Annie Hall swept the Academy Awards (winning best picture, director, screenplay, actress) but Blue Jasmine proves the 77-year-old can still make a memorable black comedy complete with distinctive characters (thanks to quality casting) and wonderful dialogue.

I’m also a fan of the way Allen uses multiple timelines in Blue Jasmine. The current day setting sees Jasmine trying to get along with her sister, find a job and meet a new man. This is interwoven with flashbacks from Jasmine’s past where we learn about her hoity-toity life in New York City and gather a better understand of why she is the way she is. The non-chronological format also allows Allen to slip in a few unexpected twists (but let’s keep quiet about that).

I can’t avoid the subject matter any longer. If there’s one reason to see this film… it’s the amazing performance of Cate Blanchett! Describing Jasmine as having “delusions of grandeur to an epic proportion”, it’s not hard to see why she was attracted to the complicated role.

It’s fascinating to watch Blanchett play a character that is so very hard to like. Just when you start to have a little empathy towards Jasmine, she’ll do something or say something to instantly squash such feelings. She’s a certainty to receive an Oscar nomination and while we’re at it, I also think Sally Hawkins (Happy-Go-Lucky) deserves similar plaudits for her performance as Jasmine’s subservient sister.

If you’re someone who likes to put together a top 10 list at the end of each year, see Blue Jasmine and you’ll only need to find 9 more.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 16 September 2013

There were roughly 60 people at the preview screening I attended a few weeks ago for One Direction: This Is Us. Of those, 4 were male. One was a father with his two kids. Another was a teenager accompanying his girlfriend. That just left myself and a friend – who I invited along so we could catch up… but also because I felt too insecure to see this film on my own.

You’d be hard pressed to find another release in 2013 with such a narrow niche audience. If you’re a fan of One Direction (of which a significant percentage are teenage girls), then you’re likely to love this. It’ll be the best film you’ll see all year! You’ll be screaming when they take off their shirts and you’ll be swooning when they do something cheeky.

But what if you’re not a One Direction fan? Is it still worth seeing? The answer is a clear no. We’ve been treated so some great music documentaries over the years that take us inside the industry and show us the many ups and downs. Examples include Searching For Sugar Man, Metallica: Some Kind Of Monster and Dig! The power of these documentaries is that they take an obscure subject matter and extract a narrative that can engross a wide audience (and not just fans of the artists).

That’s not the case here. One Direction: This Is Us feels like a 90 minute advertisement that has been created to further promote the One Direction brand. Liam, Harry, Louis, Niall and Zayn travel across the world as part of their Take Me Home Tour and take turns talking about their love for their fans, their family and the other members of the band. This is interwoven with a bunch of songs and footage of teenage girls screaming and/or crying. That’s all there is to it.

Given that the group has only been together since 2010, they don’t exactly have a huge catalogue of hits to choose from. We see them perform their most famous songs – including “One Thing” and “What Makes You Beautiful” – but they have to fall back on cover versions to make sure there’s enough music content in the film. Songs they’ve borrowed include Wheatus’s “Teenage Dirtbag” and Blondie’s “One Way Or Another”.

The film has been directed by Morgan Spurlock – the man who helped change the fast-food industry in 2005 with his Oscar-nominated Super Size Me. It’s hard to understand why Spurlock was attracted to a project like this (well, aside from the pay cheque). Was there a clause in his contract preventing him from including anything negative? The closest we get are the band members getting tired because of their “gruelling” tour schedule. They don’t complain though. They’re too nice, too mature to do that.

It ties back to a broader problem with society and our desire to look at things through rose-coloured glasses. Are we not allowed to display any sign of weakness, insecurity? Politicians now speak like robots – repeating the same slogans and buzzwords again and again. They know if they show any doubt in their party’s policies or leadership, they’ll be hung by the media. How dare they be honest and give us their personal opinion!!!

Sorry for my divergence. Let me try to tie this back to the film. While it’s sweet to hear from the boys’ parents and their fanatical supporters, I grew tired of all the compliments and back slapping. Did no one have an opposing point of view? I wish I could have heard from their minders and security personnel. Perhaps they could have offered a more insight into the boys’ personalities and the extent to which their lives are managed to help protect the valuable One Direction brand.

Meh, I should probably stop complaining. While I’ll confess that some of their songs are catchy, this film wasn’t created for “non-Directioners”. There’s footage of a passionate fan who says – “I know they love me even though they don’t know me.” That’s who this film is meant for.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 04 September 2013

The events of September 11, 2001 instilled fear into many citizens of the United States. The government responded by increasing its surveillance powers and creating the Department of Homeland Security. Airports radically overhauled their security procedures through enhanced checkpoint screenings and the installation of bulletproof cockpit doors. Whether you supported the measures or not, they played a part in making Americans feel safe again.

Now, here we are in the year 2013, watching two big-budget movies about a major terrorist attack in Washington D.C. Back in April, we were “treated” to Olympus Has Fallen where a tainted Secret Service agent (Gerard Butler) saved the day after the President was kidnapped by a group of angry North Koreans intent of kick starting a nuclear war. If you missed it… you were lucky. The film was rubbish.

White House Down follows in its footsteps. In its defence, at least it isn’t falling in the tired cliché of using a villain from the Middle East, North Korea or Eastern Europe. It’s a very pissed off American that wants to extract revenge against the President (Foxx) after his son was killed in Iran while serving in the U.S. Army. He can’t do the job alone and so he’s assembled a heavily armed team that includes a few disgruntled ex-military guys, a computer hacker and a “right-wing socialist”.

They storm the White House, kill every member of the Secret Service and take a bunch of hostages. Unfortunately, the President manages to evade their capture thanks to his new best friend – a wanna-be Secret Service agent named John Cale (Tatum) who just so happened to be taking a tour of the White House with his daughter when pandemonium broken out. It’s up to them to rescue the hostages and ensure the bad guys don’t get their hands on the nuclear launch codes. Gasp!

Cinema is a curious art form and White House Down illustrates the importance of a film’s tone. Given events in their recent history, one might think that a violent movie about a terrorist attack in the U.S. capital might be tough for Americans to watch. Not so. As he’s done in the past with films such as Independence Day, Godzilla and The Day After Tomorrow, director Roland Emmerich has taken a heavy subject matter and packaged it as “light entertainment”.

Jamie Foxx isn’t that believable as the President but there’s some fun chemistry between he and Channing Tatum as they fight their adversaries. This links to the film’s major strength – its comedy. Quite a few moments will generate a laugh from the audience and they range from the silly actions of a passionate White House tour guide… to a subtle dig at the mainstream media when Al-Qaeda is first blamed for the attacks.

Unfortunately, the rest of White House Down is a standard action fest. Channing Tatum flies through the air in slow motion, he slides across a table in slow motion, he jumps through a window in slow motion and he falls through a glass ceiling in (wait for it) slow motion. It’s not offering us anything we haven’t seen before. We even get the familiar countdown clock in the finale where our heroes are given the longest 8 minutes ever recorded.

While there a couple of half-decent twists, the plot lacks coherence. Characters behave in a manner that often doesn’t make sense. It’s like watching a bad horror movie where the victims act as if they want to get caught. The film also uses a well-worn subplot where John Cale risks the lives of millions to save his own daughter. Does this make him a hero or an idiot?

It’s better than Olympus Has Fallen but there was still a lot of room for improvement with White House Down.

Details

Written by Matthew Toomey

Created: 11 September 2013

Since mid-March, I’ve seen just over 100 films in Brisbane cinemas of which 15 have been sequels/reboots. You can add one more to that total with Riddick – the third instalment in this franchise following Pitch Black in 2000 and The Chronicles Of Riddick in 2004. Vin Diesel (Fast & Furious) is back in the leading role but aside from an insignificant cameo from Karl Urban, it’s a completely new cast.

I can’t remember much from the earlier films (well, it has been 9 years) and this film doesn’t provide much in the way of background. It’s opens with an injured Riddick (Diesel) stuck on an unknown planet and doing whatever he can to survive. Water is hard to find and he must fend off an array of nasty creatures including wild dogs and some kind of scorpion thingy. Both have long, sharp teeth.

Riddick eventually finds a deserted settlement and is able to activate an emergency beacon. Help won’t be forthcoming though. Two spaceships arrive filled with heavily armed men looking to kill Riddick. They’re bounty hunters and are hoping to cash in on a substantial reward – which will be doubled if Riddick is brought back dead as opposed to alive.

That sets the stage for the remainder of the film – a cat and mouse game where Riddick tries to evade and outsmart the bounty hunters. He may not be much of a conversationalist but Riddick has the strength, the intelligence, and the knowledge of the local area to be a formidable opponent. His goal is to steal one of the spaceships and escape this desolate planet.

I’m a little surprised to see this franchise being reinvigorated. The 2004 sequel had a budget of more than $100m and struggled to recoup that at the international box-office. Writer-director David Twohy has gone with something smaller this time. Riddick was produced for just $38m and it comes with a smaller cast and shorter action sequences.

Put simply, it’s not a great film but it’s still watchable. I like the setting and the freaky alien creatures that Riddick encounters. You know he’s going to survive… but it’s not always obvious as to how he’s going to do so. It’s also fun watching him get the better of the bounty hunters. The film doesn’t shy away from violence and as an example, there’s a graphic scene that involves someone’s head being sliced open like a tomato (which got quite a laugh at my preview screening).

That’s about all there is to it. Vin Diesel doesn’t say a lot – and that’s a good thing. He speaks in a dull, monotone voice and it’s often hard to work out if he’s just mumbling or actually saying something! Fans of Diesel won’t have a problem but others might be wondering how he’s developed a reputation as an action hero (particularly given his similar personality traits in the Fast & Furious franchise).