Reviews
Ghosts Of Girlfriends Past
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | Mark Waters |
Written by: | Jon Lucas, Scott Moore |
Starring: | Matthew McConaughey, Jennifer Garner, Michael Douglas, Breckin Meyer, Lacey Chabert, Robert Forster |
Released: | May 7, 2009 |
Grade: | C+ |
Connor Mead (McConaughey) thinks that he has a dream life. Working as a high-profile fashion photographer, Connor usually spends his day in the company of beautiful, scantily clothed women. Funnily enough, his nights are the same. Women throw themselves at Connor and it doesn’t take much effort to lure them back to his bedroom. He’s slept with countless ladies over the years and he has no intention of ever getting married.
Ah, but things are about to change. Connor returns home for the wedding of his younger brother, Paul (Meyer). At a special wedding eve dinner, Connor drunkenly disgraces himself in front of everyone. He proclaims that marriage is an outdated institution and that love doesn’t really exist.
After heading off to the bathroom to freshen up, Connor is visited by the ghost of his late uncle, Wayne (Douglas). He too led a womanising lifestyle but he has returned from the grave to warn Connor against making the same mistakes. Wayne tells him that he will be visited by three ghosts to help highlight the error of his ways.
Where is this leading, you may ask? Connor’s first girlfriend and childhood sweetheart, Jenny Perotti (Garner), just so happens to be at the wedding and is part of the bridal party. Both have feelings for the other but fate has kept them apart. Can these ghosts turn Connor into a new man and help him land his dream girl?
I’m not a fan of the romantic comedy genre and no, I didn’t like this film. I found it superficial and manipulative. The message is quite clear – guys who sleep around with hundreds of girls and who don’t believe in love will end up lonely and miserable.
I am not saying that message is flawed but what I struggled with is the way it was presented. As previously mentioned, there are many women, including the bridesmaids, who are just as "slutty" as Connor. These details are glazed over and the focus is making Connor looking like the biggest dirt bag possible. No points for subtlety.
Also puzzling were the bride and groom to be. Sandra (Chabert) is very highly strung and I couldn’t understand why Paul was going to marry her. There’s a very strange moment where she loses her cool after learning that the dinner salad didn’t contain figs. What was the point of this scene? If it was intended to highlight her pre-wedding jitters then it was lost on me. I saw her as a lunatic.
I’m straining to come up with a positive comment but I did like the performance of Jennifer Garner. She’s sweet, not too over-the-top. Sadly, she doesn’t share a lot of scenes with Connor which makes it hard to see the chemistry between them.
Directed by Mark Waters (Just Like Heaven, Mean Girls), this is yet another flick which fails to deliver what the genre promises – romance and comedy.
Star Trek
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | J.J. Abrams |
Written by: | Robert Orci, Alex Kurtzman |
Starring: | Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Leonard Nimoy, Eric Bana, Bruce Greenwood, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg, John Cho |
Released: | May 7, 2009 |
Grade: | B+ |
Captain’s Log, Stardate 2009.42. I have just retuned from a screening of the new Star Trek movie. I believe the film is non-hostile and safe to watch. The all clear has been given for other humans to approach. That said, I will closely monitor the situation and keep everyone informed.
There have been ten Star Trek movies up until this point. The last was Star Trek: Nemesis in 2002. More than seven years have passed since its release and in that time, Paramount Pictures made the decision to give the series a much overdue facelift. This new flick, simply entitled Star Trek, features a young, fresh cast and takes us back to where the story began… in a rather unique way.
There are plenty of characters but our main protagonist is James Tiberius Kirk (played by Chris Pine). James is a rebellious individual who has grown up without a father. Captain George Kirk sacrificed his life when James was born to help save the Earth from an alien attack.
James will have an opportunity to follow in his father’s footsteps. After a chance encounter with the high profile Captain Pike (Greenwood), James accepts an offer to enter the Starfleet Academy. It is there where he meets his rival – an intelligent Vulcan known simply as Spock (Quinto). The two clash on several occasions with each trying to outsmart the other. After several years of rigorous training, both James and Spock are ready to take to the skies in search of adventure.
I admit to being a little concerned by these early scenes. It thought the filmmakers had tried too hard to make the story colourful and sexy. Was this going to be another cliché-ridden action flick with lame jokes?
Thankfully, the answer was no. One the character introductions are out of the away, the suspenseful drama kicks in and the film finds it feet. James, in his first mission aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise, becomes caught up in a nasty alien invasion. It is very similar to that which his late father faced two decades ago. If the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise are any hope of saving Earth, they will need to come together and work as a team.
I’ve alluded to it in my opening paragraph but there are some nice twists in this story that will require you to switch your brain to the "on" position. They explain why this series has gone back to the very beginning and has a different cast. That’s all I’m prepared to reveal. Thumbs up go to writers Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman, who worked together on films including Transformers and The Island.
I like the cast and think that Chris Pine does a terrific job as James Kirk. His infectious enthusiasm will endear him to audiences. He’s one cool character. He shares some great scenes with Zachary Quinto who plays Spock. Also worth a mention is English actor Simon Pegg (Shaun Of The Dead) who brings comic relief to the film as Scotty.
You don’t need to be familiar with the earlier films to enjoy this latest instalment and I think it sets the stage for many more films to come.
Let The Right One In
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | Tomas Alfredson |
Written by: | John Ajvide Lindqvist |
Starring: | Kare Hedebrant, Lina Leandersson, Per Ragnar, Henrik Dahl, Karin Bergquist, Peter Carlberg |
Released: | April 23, 2009 |
Grade: | A- |
Let The Right One In is a Swedish film that has been showered with acclaim since released last year. During the recent award season, it won numerous "best foreign language film" prizes. If you check out the Internet Movie Database, you’ll realise that it has also developed a cult-like following – it is ranked 192nd on the list of all-time greatest movies.
The central character is a softly spoken 12-year-old boy named Oskar (Hedebrant). He lives with his mother in an old apartment building and largely keeps to himself. Oskar is continually bullied by a group of kids in his class at school. Each time it happens, these bullies see a quiet, emotionless look on Oskar’s face. What they don’t see… is the burning desire that he carries within to get revenge.
Standing in the snow in the courtyard outside his building, Oskar meets Eli (Leandersson), a young girl who has moved in next door. When he asks how old she is, Eli responds with "12 years old… give or take". It’s a strange answer but we soon find out why. Eli is a vampire. She looks innocent enough but she has an insatiable thirst for human blood which will never be diminished.
Eli lives with her father, Hakan (Per Ragnar) who helps protect her daughter. He sneaks out at night, finds fresh victims, and drains them of their blood. This isn’t something that he enjoys doing. He’s not a pathological serial killer. Hakan does it for the love of his daughter and will do whatever is necessary to keep her alive and happy.
It may sound like a contraction but this is a beautiful film and a creepy film. I loved the world that has been created by director Tomas Alfredson. There isn’t a lot of dialogue but the visuals are striking. You will feel the coldness and hear the silence. Alfredson obviously subscribes to the theory that "a picture paints a thousand words".
So what becomes of Oskar and Eli? I’d like you to see this film to find out for yourself. It reminded me in many ways of Pan’s Labyrinth in that it is a modern day fairy tale with some dark themes. Without a doubt, it’s one of the best foreign language releases for the year.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | Gavin Hood |
Written by: | David Benioff, Skip Woods |
Starring: | Hugh Jackman, Live Schreiber, Danny Huston, Will I Am, Dominic Monaghan, Taylor Kitsch |
Released: | April 29, 2009 |
Grade: | C+ |
There have been three films in the X-Men series to date and I’ve liked them all. They explored some interesting moral issues against the backdrop of a rather complex storyline. The characters were cool too.
The last X-Men flick was released three years ago and instead of churning out another sequel, 20th Century Fox has taken a different path. They’ve made a prequel which focuses on Wolverine and how he came to be. It’s bound to be popular given that Wolverine was easily the most popular mutant from the earlier flicks.
Unfortunately, I didn’t like this movie. Hugh Jackman runs around punching bad guys and blowing stuff up like a stereotypical action hero. It lacks the suspense and the depth of the other films. It starts off poorly and isn’t improved by a finale which is all special effects and no emotion.
The bad guy is a power-hungry government official named William Stryker (Huston). He has a secret lair where he’s been committing scientific experiments on mutant beings. He’s trying to harness their powers so that he can create a super mutant. One of the guys is he wants is Wolverine – for his fighting skills and retractable metal claws.
Having lived a quiet life for a number of years, Stryker lures Wolverine out of hiding by having his long-time girlfriend killed. The killer is Wolverine’s brother, Sabretooth (Schreiber). As you’d expect, this enrages Wolverine and sets him on a quest to track down Sabretooth and Stryker.
The more I think about this story, the less sense it makes. New characters are introduced late in proceedings for no apparent reason. Are they there for possible sequels? It’s also hard to work out who’s pulling the strings. Stryker seems to be in control but why everyone is helping him to become a super villain are beyond me. Dr. Evil is Austin Powers had better motives… and that film was a comedy!
With all the marketing hype, moviegoers will stand in queues like lemmings to buy tickets to this film this weekend. I’m willing to bet that the majority will leave the cinema unsatisfied.
Fast And Furious
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | Justin Lin |
Written by: | Chris Morgan |
Starring: | Vin Diesel, Paul Walker, Jordana Brewster, Michelle Rodriguez, John Ortiz, Laz Alonso |
Released: | April 16, 2009 |
Grade: | B |
The Fast & The Furious was one of the biggest success stories of 2001. It made a lot of money at the box-office and was well received by the public. In my initial review, I described it as being "edge of your seat stuff".
Since then, the series has had a few "accidents" and to use another metaphor, has spent a fair amount of time in the repair shop. Paul Walker was the only member of the cast to return for the sequel (2 Fast 2 Furious) and the less that is said about The Fast The Furious: Tokyo Drift, the better.
The good news is that this franchise is back on the open road and is travelling at full speed. As the advertising points out, all of the original cast have returned for Fast & Furious. None of them have gone onto super stardom since the first flick so perhaps they’ve returned for the pay cheque? Maybe they’ve reunited to do a little reminiscing.
Whatever their motivations, their appearance has gotten the public off their backsides and into movie theatres. When it opened in the United States last week, it made $71m in its first three days. That’s the biggest opening since The Dark Knight in July 2008.
When I went to the preview screening, my attention was largely on the action scenes. The special effects are obvious but it’s still exhilarating. The problem I now have is that I’m a little sketchy about the plot. Maybe I wasn’t paying enough attention? Maybe there wasn’t any story to begin with?
All I’ll say is that Dominic (Diesel) and Brian (Walker) are both out to capture a nasty Mexican drug dealer. They have differing motivations but are equal in terms of their unrelenting passion. They throw their bodies around with reckless abandon. Their juiced up cars go through the ringer as well. Presented with the same situation, I think I would have died 20 times over.
The best parts of the movie are when the actors keep their mouths shut and the action does the talking. The dialogue is laughable in places. But like I said, there are some very cool action sequences that more than compensate. One of the highlights is a car chase through an underground tunnel on the Mexican border.
Vroom, vroom!
Fired Up
- Details
- Written by Matthew Toomey
Directed by: | Will Gluck |
Written by: | Freedom Jones |
Starring: | Nicholas D’Agosto, Eric Christian Olsen, Sarah Roemer, Philip Baker Hall, John Michael Higgins, Molly Sims |
Released: | April 23, 2009 |
Grade: | B |
Fired Up is about two football jocks who go to cheerleading camp over the summer so that they can have their choice of over 300 chicks. Need I say any more?
I do enjoy a deep, meaningful drama. Already this year we’ve been treated to great films such as The Wrester, The Reader and Milk. That said, trashy comedies such as this still have their place in the world of cinema. Sometimes the best thing to do is sit back, turn off the brain and have a few laughs. Fired Up is a perfect example.
The two leading dudes are Nicholas D’Agosto (Heroes) and Eric Christian Olsen (Dumb And Dumberer). Nicholas plays Shawn - the smart, conservative guy. Eric plays Nick – the bold, outgoing guy. The girls at the camp know exactly what our two protagonists are up to but most don’t seem to mind.
Given the limited storyline, it’s no wonder that screenwriter Freedom Jones had trouble dragging it out for 90 minutes. His attempt at creating a semi-dramatic ending was ridiculous. On the other hand, he doesn’t seem to have had any trouble crafting some funny jokes. There are a few "laugh out loud" moment and the highlight involves a scene from the iconic cheerleading flick Bring It On.
I don’t think any of us are going to remember this film in six months time but it’s the only major new release showing in our multiplexes this week, so I guess it’ll just have to do.